Fixing Bugs With Patches

Registered by David Murphy

Review of process identified at Karmic UDS for dealing with bugs with patches. Does the process outlined still make sense?

Blueprint information

Status:
Complete
Approver:
Marjo F. Mercado
Priority:
High
Drafter:
Brian Murray
Direction:
Approved
Assignee:
Brian Murray
Definition:
Approved
Series goal:
Accepted for lucid
Implementation:
Implemented
Milestone target:
milestone icon ubuntu-10.04-beta-1
Started by
Marjo F. Mercado
Completed by
Brian Murray

Related branches

Sprints

Whiteboard

2009-11-30 - changing implementation status to Not Started to reset it from being complete

Work items:
[james-w] Get in touch with Daniel Chen about Reviewers Team: DONE
[dholbach] Create ubuntu code reviewers team in Launchpad: DONE
[dholbach] Document process at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews: DONE
[brian-murray] Write a script to subscribe the team to new bugs with patches: DONE
[brian-murray] Document new tag "patch-needswork" and "patch-refused" and add to the list and official bug tags: DONE
[brian-murray] Blog about process: DONE
[dholbach] Blog about progress: DONE
[brian-murray] Keep stats on quantity of bugs with patches: DONE
[brian-murray] Make a graph of bugs with patches: DONE
[brian-murray] Document process for bugs w/ branches to request a merge proposal for the reviewers team to review: POSTPONED to ubuntu-10.04-beta-1
[james-w] File a bug (bug 483931) that there is not an active reviews page for ubuntu: DONE

Work items for ubuntu-10.04-beta-1:
[brian-murray] Document process for bugs w/ branches to request a merge proposal for the reviewers team to review: DONE
[brian-murray] Investigate have the script that watches for patches watch for branches w/o merge proposals: DONE

Bugs with branches notes (bdmurray)
While it'd be possible to have another script subscribe the ubuntu-reviewers team to bugs with branches the workflow for it is significantly different from the workflow for bugs with branches that they should not be shoe-horned into this specification.

(?)

Work Items